Boccieri: Missile Defense In Northeast Ohio Is Strategic Decision
Local military training center one of three locations nationwide considered for ballistic missile protection system

State Rep. John Boccieri (D-Poland) today announced his support for the Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center as the preferred site for the East Coast Missile Defense System.

The 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), as passed by Congress, requires the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), a division of the Department of Defense (DoD), to select an interceptor site along the East Coast for possible deployment of missile batteries. This missile defense site will aim to protect the homeland from a ballistic missile attack. Current sites already exist in Alaska and California.

The MDA is set to decide within the next few days among three possible ground-based defense system sites: Camp Ravenna, Fort Drum in New York and Fort Custer Training Center in Michigan.

“Camp Ravenna can be the ‘Iron-Dome’ for the East Coast,” said Boccieri, a member of the U.S. Air Force Reserve. “Strategically, this site will protect the East Coast from growing ballistic missile threats and, if the DoD decides to use this base, it will not interrupt any current training by reservists.”

The Poland lawmaker believes Ohio’s strong technological base will support the selection of Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center by the MDA, with Wright Patterson Air Force Base and the NASA/Glenn Propulsion Research Center both located in the Buckeye State.

“This site selection will only increase the strong military presence in northeast Ohio and have a positive economic impact on a region that always steps forward to help defend the nation,” added Boccieri.

The 2013 NDAA requires the MDA to prepare Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) for each possible location; the assessments were released May 31 for all three locations. Establishing the missile defense system in either one of the two non-Ohio sites has been determined to cause major traffic impacts, and there are potentially vulnerable structures close to the proposed facility at Fort Drum. In regards to Camp Ravenna, the MDA was slightly concerned about local contaminated groundwater and potential wetlands loss as a result of construction. However, EIAs are only one part of the equation and MDA has confirmed that other variables will be just as important in selecting a location.

Featured Posts

Boccieri: BRAC Report Good First Step To Protect Ohio Military Installations


State Rep John Boccieri (D-Poland) today said that the State of Ohio’s Base Realignment and Closure’s (BRAC) Task Force recommendations are a good first step toward strengthening military assets in Ohio. The Task Force’s primary mission was to identify all federal assets, including military bases, and speak toward their value in terms of military mission as well as the economic benefit they provide to communities.


Lawmakers Concerned School Rating Overhaul Leaves Youngstown Schools Behind


State Reps. John Boccieri (D-Poland) and Michele Lepore-Hagan (D-Youngstown) today expressed concern about House Bill (HB) 591, a Republican-led effort to once again overhaul the state’s school report card system. The bill would leave current triggers in place for schools that are under or near academic distress—a move the lawmakers say unfairly targets districts in academic distress like Youngstown, Lorain and at least 22 other districts across the state.



Ohio House Passes Measure Urging Selection Of Camp Ravenna As Missile Defense System


State Reps. John Boccieri (D-Poland), Mike O’Brien (D-Warren), Glenn W. Holmes (D-Girard) and Michele Lepore-Hagan (D-Youngstown) today applauded the Ohio House for unanimously passing Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 8, which calls on the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (USMDA) to select Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center as the preferred site for a future east coast Missile Defense system. MDA, a sub-agency of the Department of Defense (DOD), announced its consideration of Camp Ravenna among two other locations for a potential future deployment of additional ground-based interceptors for homeland defense.